Security & operations
Turn security signals into evidence-backed operational context.
SKALV does not replace your SIEM, SOC or monitoring stack. It adds the organisational context around a signal: what evidence supports it, which dependencies may be exposed, what remains unknown and who can verify it.
A typical scenario
A detection fires on a system that a business function depends on. The technical picture is in the SIEM. What is missing is which operations are exposed, what is still unknown, and who has authority to answer it. That is the gap SKALV fills.
Integrating with what you run
Detections can be forwarded as signed webhooks or polled over REST. SKALV records what was received and from where, and never claims that a received detection is a verified incident.
Organisational impact
Technical assets are related to the operational nodes and functions they serve, so exposure is expressed in terms the rest of the organisation can act on.
Verification and authority
Open questions are assigned to named reviewers with the capability to answer them. Their answers become evidence with their own origin, not an informal message thread.
Explicit non-replacement
SKALV performs no detection, no log collection and no endpoint action. It sits beside the security stack and depends on it. Any vendor claiming to replace all three is worth a second question.
See SKALV with your own operational scenario.
Bring a real scenario — the sources you follow, the functions you cannot lose — and we will show where SKALV fits and where it does not.